Cooper v. Realty Appraisers, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Cooper v. Realty Appraisers, Inc.

3 Misc. 2d 646, 148 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2228

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 17, 1956

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Misc. 2d 646 (Cooper v. Realty Appraisers, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. Realty Appraisers, Inc., 3 Misc. 2d 646, 148 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2228 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

Benedict D. Dineen, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff performed certain services in connection with negotiations for the purchase and sale of real property in the city of Richmond, Virginia. It further alleges that the plaintiff is a duly licensed real estate broker of the State of Virginia but does not allege that he is duly licensed as such in the State of New York pursuant to section 442-d of the Real Property Law. [647]*647If the plaintiff claims to be excluded from the provisions of section 442-d or that the same are not applicable in the present action those facts must be alleged. The complaint is silent as to where the contract was entered into and where the services were performed. Such facts might obviate the provisions of the statute. Motion granted but with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within 10 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry thereof. Order signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Benedict D. Dineen, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff performed certain services in connection with negotiations for the purchase and sale of real property in the city of Richmond, Virginia. It further alleges that the plaintiff is a duly licensed real estate broker of the State of Virginia but does not allege that he is duly licensed as such in the State of New York pursuant to section 442-d of the Real Property Law. [647]*647If the plaintiff claims to be excluded from the provisions of section 442-d or that the same are not applicable in the present action those facts must be alleged. The complaint is silent as to where the contract was entered into and where the services were performed. Such facts might obviate the provisions of the statute. Motion granted but with leave to the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint within 10 days after service of a copy of this order, with notice of entry thereof. Order signed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Misc. 2d 646, 148 N.Y.S.2d 559, 1956 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-realty-appraisers-inc-nysupct-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack