Cooper v. Potts

39 A. 824, 185 Pa. 115, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 679
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 21, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 485·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We think the findings of fact contained in the auditor’s report are fully sustained by the testimony, and upon those findings, and for the reasons stated in the report of the auditor and in the opinion of the learned court below we affirm the decree.

Decree affirmed and appeal, dismissed at the cost of the appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Potts, 39 A. 824, 185 Pa. 115, 1898 Pa. LEXIS 679 (Pa. 1898).

39 A. 824 (Cooper v. Potts) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Emperee v. Meyers
269 A.2d 731 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Carl Gutmann & Co. v. Rohrer Knitting Mills, Inc.
86 F. Supp. 506 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1949)
Tossini v. Donahue
117 N.W. 148 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1908)
Thompson v. Laboringman's Mercantile & Manufacturing Co.
53 S.E. 908 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1906)