Cooper v. Permanent General Assurance Corporation
This text of Cooper v. Permanent General Assurance Corporation (Cooper v. Permanent General Assurance Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Dariell Cooper, Respondent,
v.
Permanent General Assurance Corporation, Appellant.
Appeal From Sumter County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-200
Submitted February 1, 2005 Filed March 18, 2005
AFFIRMED
J.R. Murphy, and Adam J. Neil, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Nelson R. Parker, of Manning, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Permanent General Assurance Corporation appeals a trial courts grant of summary judgment to Dariell Cooper on the issue of whether Cooper may recover underinsured motorist benefits under an insurance policy not providing primary coverage on the motorcycle involved in the accident. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220, SCACR and the following authority: Burgess v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 361 S.C. 196, 603 S.E.2d 861 (Ct. App. 2004), cert. pending, (considering analogous facts and holding motorcyclist was entitled to underinsured motorist benefits under policy not covering motorcycle).
AFFIRMED.
HEARN, C.J., KITTREDGE, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cooper v. Permanent General Assurance Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-permanent-general-assurance-corporation-scctapp-2005.