Cooper v. P & T General Contracting Corp.

260 A.D.2d 423, 686 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3848
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 12, 1999
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 260 A.D.2d 423 (Cooper v. P & T General Contracting Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooper v. P & T General Contracting Corp., 260 A.D.2d 423, 686 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Barasch, J.), dated May 14, 1998, as granted that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to vacate an order of the same court, dated December 9, 1997, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a judgment on the issue of liability upon the defendant’s default in answering and directing an inquest on the issue of damages.

Ordered that the order dated May 14, 1998, is reversed insofar as appealed from, as a matter of discretion, with costs, that branch of the defendant’s motion which was to vacate the order dated December 9, 1997, is denied, and the order dated December 9, 1997, granting the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a judgment on the issue of liability and directing an inquest on the issue of damages is reinstated.

The defendant moved, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) to vacate an order entered against it by the plaintiffs upon its default in answering or appearing. However, because the defendant demonstrated neither a reasonable excuse for its default nor a meritorious defense, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in granting that relief (see, Roussodimou v Zafiriadis, 238 AD2d 568; Fennell v Mason, 204 AD2d 599; Putney v Pearlman, 203 AD2d 333). O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Castillo
287 A.D.2d 706 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Mucci v. Preferred Construction, Inc.
284 A.D.2d 512 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Kerrigan v. Textile Deliveries, Inc.
284 A.D.2d 376 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Elise v. Western Beef, Inc.
279 A.D.2d 501 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Frisch v. Abdelhak
279 A.D.2d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Trustees of Northport-East Northport Public Library v. Preferred Mutual Insurance
276 A.D.2d 788 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Lee v. Sottile
276 A.D.2d 597 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Mercado v. Ospina
269 A.D.2d 370 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
260 A.D.2d 423, 686 N.Y.S.2d 715, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-p-t-general-contracting-corp-nyappdiv-1999.