Cooper v. Oklahoma City
This text of 1973 OK CR 220 (Cooper v. Oklahoma City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Cleo Cooper, Jr., hereinafter referred to as defendant, was charged, tried and convicted in the Municipal Criminal Court of the City of Oklahoma City, Case No. 14388, for the crime of Reckless Driving. He was sentenced to serve a term of twenty (20) days in the City Jail and to pay a fine of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00). From said judgment and sentence, a timely appeal has been perfected to this Court.
In view of our holding in this case and in cases recently decided, we do not feel that a statement of the facts is required.
In Goomda v. City of Oklahoma City, Okl.Cr., 506 P.2d 991 (1973), the Syllabus of the Court stated:
“On a review of a municipal court judgment the Court of Criminal Appeals will not take judicial notice of an ordinance involved, .... Such ordinance must be reflected in the record, . . . or the wording must have been agreed to by the parties and stipulation entered in the record during trial.”
Since the record before us fails to reflect the ordinance under which the defendant was tried and convicted, we are of the opinion that the judgment and sentence appealed from must be, and hereby is, Reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1973 OK CR 220, 509 P.2d 910, 1973 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 466, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-oklahoma-city-oklacrimapp-1973.