Cooper v. O'Brien

639 F. App'x 196
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 5, 2016
DocketNo. 15-7736
StatusPublished

This text of 639 F. App'x 196 (Cooper v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooper v. O'Brien, 639 F. App'x 196 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Andre Cooper, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation, of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave-to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cooper v. O’Brien, No. 5:14-cv-00112-FPS-MJA (N.D.W.Va. Oct. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because.the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
639 F. App'x 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-obrien-ca4-2016.