Cooper v. Noble

41 F.3d 212, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35422, 1994 WL 700309
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cooper v. Noble. Read the opinion of the Court — 33 F.3d 540
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 15, 1994·No. No. 93-7678·Published

Opinion

EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judge:

We supplement our prior opinion, see Cooper v. Noble, 33 F.3d 540 (5th Cir.1994), as follows:

The Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (“the Act”), P.L. 103-322, 108 Stat. 1796, effective September 13, 1994, provides for periodic reopening “at the behest of a defendant” of court orders or consent decrees seeking to remedy prison or jail crowding that violates the Eighth Amendment. Id. § 20409(a) (codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3626(c)). The Act applies to all outstanding court orders on the date of its enactment. Id. § 20409(b).

No issue pertaining to the Act was brought before us; the defendants did not, pursuant to the Act, request a reopening; and, finally, the District Court proceedings reviewed in this appeal were conducted prior to September 13, 1994. Accordingly, the provisions of the Act are not applicable to our determination of the instant appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Noble, 41 F.3d 212, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 35422, 1994 WL 700309 (5th Cir. 1994).

41 F.3d 212 (Cooper v. Noble) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cooper v. Noble
33 F.3d 540 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)