Cooper v. Lingo
Opinion
The judgment in this case must be reversed, on the authority of Negley v. Wilson, 14 Ind. 215; Seymour v. The State, 15 Ind. 288; and Redwine v. The State, [68] id. 293. This cause was tried by a stranger, not by the legal and judicially recognized judge. In such case, the record must show the right of such stranger to act. Negley v. Wilson, supra. ms case, the authority under which the stranger acted, is set out in the record, and appears on its face to be void, as it was given under circumstances, according to the face of the record, where the law did not authorize it to be conferred.(l) Seymour v. The State, and Redwine v. The State, supra. See, also, The Board of Com's v. Coats, at this term; and Miller v. Burger, 2 Ind. 337. The judgment is reversed, with costs. Cause remanded for another trial, with leave to amend, &c.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
17 Ind. 67 (Cooper v. Lingo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.