Cooper v. Knight

157 So. 27, 117 Fla. 32, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1184
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 19, 1934
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 157 So. 27 (Cooper v. Knight) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooper v. Knight, 157 So. 27, 117 Fla. 32, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1184 (Fla. 1934).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is from an order confirming a sale of lands under a foreclosure decree and awarding on motion a deficiency decree against the defendant. On the showing made as to the value of the property the sale should not have been confirmed; and the deficiency decree was consequently erroneously rendered. The issue of usury presented in defense of a deficiency decree need not be now considered as the order confirming the foreclosure sale is reversed. In Garner v. Slack, 112 Fla. 553, 150 So. 750, the motion for a deficiency decree was not challenged; there was as here a prayer for general relief. See Coe-Mortimer Co. v. Dusendschon, 113 Fla. 818, 152 So. 729; Atlantic Shores Corp. v. Zetterlund, 103 Fla. 761, 138 So. 50.

Reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Brown and Buford, J. J., concur. . Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Union Joint Stock Land Bank of Louisville v. Knox County
97 S.W.2d 842 (Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
157 So. 27, 117 Fla. 32, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-knight-fla-1934.