Cooper v. Kelner & Kelner
This text of 45 A.D.3d 323 (Cooper v. Kelner & Kelner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Yvonne Gonzalez, J.), entered August 23, 2006, dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same court and Justice, entered August 4, 2006, which granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.
Defendants demonstrated prima facie entitlement to judgment in this legal malpractice action by showing plaintiffs could not prove that but for defendants’ alleged negligence, plaintiffs would have succeeded in the underlying litigation (see e.g. Leder v Spiegel, 9 NY3d 836 [2007]; Reibman v Senie, 302 AD2d 290 [2003]). Plaintiffs speculated that Carnival Cruise Lines had notice of an allegedly unsecured and loose carpet edge abutting the linoleum, which posed a tripping hazard when pressure was applied by the weight of pedestrian traffic; this was insufficient to raise an issue of fact (see Hagood v City of New York, 13 AD3d 413 [2004]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli, McGuire and Malone, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A.D.3d 323, 844 N.Y.S.2d 292, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-kelner-kelner-nyappdiv-2007.