Cooper v. Hamidullah
This text of Cooper v. Hamidullah (Cooper v. Hamidullah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-6674
EUGENE COOPER, a/k/a Eugene E. Cooper,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MATTHEW B. HAMIDULLAH, in his individual capacity; DAVID GARCIA, in his individual capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:07-cv-00113-TLW)
Submitted: March 25, 2009 Decided: April 6, 2009
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Eugene Cooper appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm the order of the district court. See
Cooper v. Hamidullah, No. 4:07-cv-00113-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 31,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cooper v. Hamidullah, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-hamidullah-ca4-2009.