Cooper v. Hair

178 N.C. 657
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided October 22, 1919·Published

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

Tbe defendant is entitled to be credited witb tbe value of tbe notes seized in' tbis action and delivered to tbe plaintiff, under tbe authority of Smith v. Branch, 141 N. C., 1, and tbe execution upon tbe judgment is suspended until tbis amount can be ascertained by reference or otherwise, and due- credit be given.

We have examined tbe other exceptions relied on by tbe defendant and find no error.

Modified and affirmed. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Hair, 178 N.C. 657 (N.C. 1919).

178 N.C. 657 (Cooper v. Hair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. French.
53 S.E. 435 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)