Cooper v. . Hair
This text of 100 S.E. 513 (Cooper v. . Hair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action on two notes, one for $1,254 secured by an agricultural lien, and the other for $287.78, secured by notes deposited as collateral, and on account for fertilizers also secured in said lien.
The plaintiff sued out claim and delivery papers in the action under which twenty-five bushels of corn and the collateral notes were seized and delivered to the plaintiff in January, 1916.
The issues joined between the parties were referred by (658) consent and the referee has made a full report except that he does not find the value of the notes delivered to the plaintiff, and the defendant has received no credit therefor, although in his answer he demanded that the plaintiff be charged with the value of the notes, and he made this same demand in his exceptions to the report of the referee, and at the time the judgment was signed.
Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendant appealed.
The defendant is entitled to be credited with the value of the notes seized in this action and delivered to the plaintiff, under the authority of Smith v. French,
We have examined the other exceptions relied on by the defendant and find no error.
Modified and affirmed. *Page 707
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 S.E. 513, 178 N.C. 657, 1919 N.C. LEXIS 527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-hair-nc-1919.