Cooper v. Golden, Ralston Creek & Church Ditch Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Cooper v. Golden, Ralston Creek & Church Ditch Co.

27 Colo. App. 499

CourtColorado Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 15, 1915

DocketNo. 4175

StatusPublished

This text of 27 Colo. App. 499 (Cooper v. Golden, Ralston Creek & Church Ditch Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. Golden, Ralston Creek & Church Ditch Co., 27 Colo. App. 499 (Colo. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

King, J.,

rendered the opinion of the court.

June 16, 1914, the transcript of record, together with assignments of error, was filed in the' Supreme Court, upon a judgment of the court below rendered November 7, 1911. Plaintiff in error filed his abstract of the record July 1, 1914, and on the same date copies thereof were served on the attorneys of record in the court below. Writ of error issued and was filed in accordance with the Supreme Court rule. Brief of the plaintiff in error was also filed July 1, 1914. No scire facias or summons hear errors issued until November 11, 1914, more than three years after the rendition of the judgment.

Upon the foregoing statement of facts the motion of defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error must be granted. Issuance of the scire facias was not waived by acknowledgment of receipt of the abstract of record and briefs, nor did the appearance of defendant in error, for the purpose only of making the motion to dismiss the writ, constitute such an- appearance as would operate as a waiver; McVicker v. Rouse, 44 Colo., 255, 98 Pac., 807; Brady v. People, 45 Colo., 364, 101 Pac., 340; Rudolph v. Rudolph, 50 Colo., 243, 114 Pac., 977; Chittenden v. Hill, 55 Colo., 65, 132 Pac., 66.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

King, J.,

rendered the opinion of the court.

June 16, 1914, the transcript of record, together with assignments of error, was filed in the' Supreme Court, upon a judgment of the court below rendered November 7, 1911. Plaintiff in error filed his abstract of the record July 1, 1914, and on the same date copies thereof were served on the attorneys of record in the court below. Writ of error issued and was filed in accordance with the Supreme Court rule. Brief of the plaintiff in error was also filed July 1, 1914. No scire facias or summons hear errors issued until November 11, 1914, more than three years after the rendition of the judgment.

Upon the foregoing statement of facts the motion of defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error must be granted. Issuance of the scire facias was not waived by acknowledgment of receipt of the abstract of record and briefs, nor did the appearance of defendant in error, for the purpose only of making the motion to dismiss the writ, constitute such an- appearance as would operate as a waiver; McVicker v. Rouse, 44 Colo., 255, 98 Pac., 807; Brady v. People, 45 Colo., 364, 101 Pac., 340; Rudolph v. Rudolph, 50 Colo., 243, 114 Pac., 977; Chittenden v. Hill, 55 Colo., 65, 132 Pac., 66.

Writ of error dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 Colo. App. 499, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-golden-ralston-creek-church-ditch-co-coloctapp-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack