Cooper v. Golden, Ralston Creek & Church Ditch Co.

27 Colo. App. 499
Colorado Court of Appeals·Decided April 15, 1915·No. No. 4175·Published

Opinion

King, J.,

rendered the opinion of the court.

June 16, 1914, the transcript of record, together with assignments of error, was filed in the' Supreme Court, upon a judgment of the court below rendered November 7, 1911. Plaintiff in error filed his abstract of the record July 1, 1914, and on the same date copies thereof were served on the attorneys of record in the court below. Writ of error issued and was filed in accordance with the Supreme Court rule. Brief of the plaintiff in error was also filed July 1, 1914. No scire facias or summons hear errors issued until November 11, 1914, more than three years after the rendition of the judgment.

Upon the foregoing statement of facts the motion of defendant in error to dismiss the writ of error must be granted. Issuance of the scire facias was not waived by acknowledgment of receipt of the abstract of record and briefs, nor did the appearance of defendant in error, for the purpose only of making the motion to dismiss the writ, constitute such an- appearance as would operate as a waiver; McVicker v. Rouse, 44 Colo., 255, 98 Pac., 807; Brady v. People, 45 Colo., 364, 101 Pac., 340; Rudolph v. Rudolph, 50 Colo., 243, 114 Pac., 977; Chittenden v. Hill, 55 Colo., 65, 132 Pac., 66.

Writ of error dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Golden, Ralston Creek & Church Ditch Co., 27 Colo. App. 499 (Colo. Ct. App. 1915).

27 Colo. App. 499 (Cooper v. Golden, Ralston Creek & Church Ditch Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McVicker v. Rouse
44 Colo. 255 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1908)
Brady v. People
45 Colo. 364 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1909)
Rudolph v. Rudolph
50 Colo. 243 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1911)
Chittenden v. Hill
55 Colo. 65 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1913)