Cooper v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

17 So. 3d 912, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14498, 2009 WL 3109926
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 30, 2009
DocketNo. 1D09-3894
StatusPublished

This text of 17 So. 3d 912 (Cooper v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooper v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 17 So. 3d 912, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14498, 2009 WL 3109926 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we are required to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. However, in light of appellant’s allegation that delivery of the agency’s final order to him was delayed because it was mailed to his former address, notwithstanding the fact that he made the agency aware of his change of address, this disposition is without prejudice to appellant’s right to seek relief by filing a motion with the Unemployment Appeals Commission requesting that it vacate and reenter the final order at issue. See Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp., 721 So.2d 399 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

BROWNING, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Etienne v. Simco Recycling Corp.
721 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 So. 3d 912, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 14498, 2009 WL 3109926, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2009.