Home/Supreme Judicial Court of Maine/Cooper v. Fidelity Trust Co.

Cooper v. Fidelity Trust Co.

4 A.2d 837, 136 Me. 514, 1939 Me. LEXIS 49
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cooper v. Fidelity Trust Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Me. 129 →
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided March 10, 1939·Published

Opinion

The record in this cause is, in respect to its evidential showing, plainly insuffi[515]*515cient for a decision of this controversy on its merits. It is apparent that the existing deficiency might be supplied. The appeal is therefore dismissed, the decree below vacated, and the case remanded. So ordered.

Albert E. Anderson, for appellant. Cook, Hutchinson, Pierce & Connell, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Fidelity Trust Co., 4 A.2d 837, 136 Me. 514, 1939 Me. LEXIS 49 (Me. 1939).

4 A.2d 837 (Cooper v. Fidelity Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.