Cooper v. Dupnik

933 F.2d 798, 1991 WL 84247

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 23, 1991·No. Nos. 88-15661, 88-15685·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Dupnik, 933 F.2d 798, 1991 WL 84247 (9th Cir. 1991).

Pincite

933 F.2d 798 (Cooper v. Dupnik) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Cooper v. Dupnik

963 F.2d 1220 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)

Buckey v. County of Los Angeles

957 F.2d 652 (Ninth Circuit, 1992)

Michael Cooper, Husband, in His Own Capacity and as Parent of Abram and Adam Cooper, Minors Lidia Cooper, Wife, in Her Own Capacity and as Parent of Abram Cooper and Adam Cooper, Minors v. Clarence Dupnik, Sheriff, Pima County Tom Taylor, an Employee of Pima County Sheriff's Department Weaver Barkman, an Employee of Pima County Sheriff's Department, Michael Cooper, Husband, in His Own Capacity and as Parent of Abram and Adam Cooper, Minors Lidia Cooper, Wife, in Her Own Capacity and as Parent of Abram Cooper and Adam Cooper, Minors v. Clarence Dupnik, Sheriff, Pima County, and City of Tucson Tucson Police Department Peter Ronstadt Karen Wright Gene Scott Timothy O'Sullivan Kay McCall

933 F.2d 798 (Ninth Circuit, 1991)

Opinion

Related