Cooper v. DSM Nutritional Products, LLC

Fourth Circuit

Cooper v. DSM Nutritional Products, LLC

540 F. App'x 206

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2013·No. No. 13-1434·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Trey Z. Cooper appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of DSM Nutritional Products, LLC, in Cooper’s employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cooper v. DSM Nutritional Prods., LLC, No. 4:11-cv-02553-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Trey Z. Cooper appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting summary judgment in favor of DSM Nutritional Products, LLC, in Cooper’s employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cooper v. DSM Nutritional Prods., LLC, No. 4:11-cv-02553-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cooper v. DSM Nutritional Products, LLC, 540 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

540 F. App'x 206 (Cooper v. DSM Nutritional Products, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.