Cooper v. Dooley
This text of Cooper v. Dooley (Cooper v. Dooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7226
ZACHARY COOPER, SR.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
J. DOOLEY, Counselor; CORDLE, Counselor; D. VASS, Treatment Program Supervisor; K. PRICE, Human Rights Advocate; K. L. PICKEREL, Former Assistant Warden; R. C. MATHENA, Warden; C. PARR, Human Rights Advocate Senior; W. L. HUFFMAN, Former Regional Director; J. GARMAN, Regional Director; GENE JOHNSON, Director,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (7:10-cv-00290-gec-mfu)
Submitted: February 22, 2011 Decided: March 15, 2011
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Zachary Cooper, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Zachary Cooper, Sr., appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Cooper v. Dooley, No. 7:10-cv-00290-gec-mfu (W.D. Va.
July 30, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cooper v. Dooley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-dooley-ca4-2011.