Cooper v. Delo

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cooper v. Delo

810 S.W.2d 126, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 834, 1991 WL 97978

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 1991·No. No. 58781·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this court-tried replevin case, plaintiff appeals pro se from judgment entered in favor of defendants.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this court-tried replevin case, plaintiff appeals pro se from judgment entered in favor of defendants.

An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Cooper v. Delo, 810 S.W.2d 126, 1991 Mo. App. LEXIS 834, 1991 WL 97978 (Mo. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

810 S.W.2d 126 (Cooper v. Delo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.