Cooper v. Crestwood Amoco, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cooper v. Crestwood Amoco, Inc.

263 S.W.3d 805, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1293, 2008 WL 4330321

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 23, 2008·No. No. ED 90653·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dorothy Cooper appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission reversing the decision of the Division of Employment Security’s appeals tribunal and denying her unemployment benefits. We find that the Commission did not err in denying Cooper unemployment benefits.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dorothy Cooper appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission reversing the decision of the Division of Employment Security’s appeals tribunal and denying her unemployment benefits. We find that the Commission did not err in denying Cooper unemployment benefits.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The decision is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cooper v. Crestwood Amoco, Inc., 263 S.W.3d 805, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1293, 2008 WL 4330321 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

263 S.W.3d 805 (Cooper v. Crestwood Amoco, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.