Cooper v. County of Floyd

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cooper v. County of Floyd

37 S.E. 91, 112 Ga. 70, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 32

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedOctober 29, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 37 S.E. 91 (Cooper v. County of Floyd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. County of Floyd, 37 S.E. 91, 112 Ga. 70, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 32 (Ga. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

Lumpkin, P. J.

One who deliberately and intentionally drove at night upon a-county bridge with the condition of which he was perfectly familiar, and who, according to his own testimony, knew that the bridge was dangerous because it had no guard-rails, was not, upon a petition alleging no negligence except, failure to erect such rails, entitled to recover for injuries occasioned solely by reason of their absence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lumpkin, P. J.

One who deliberately and intentionally drove at night upon a-county bridge with the condition of which he was perfectly familiar, and who, according to his own testimony, knew that the bridge was dangerous because it had no guard-rails, was not, upon a petition alleging no negligence except, failure to erect such rails, entitled to recover for injuries occasioned solely by reason of their absence.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 S.E. 91, 112 Ga. 70, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-county-of-floyd-ga-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack