Cooper v. Cooper

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cooper v. Cooper

835 S.W.2d 327, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 667, 1992 WL 80982

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cooper v. Cooper. Read the opinion of the Court — 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1177 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 21, 1992·No. No. 60556·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from an order finding Husband had induced Wife to agree to a settlement of their dissolution proceeding whereby Wife waived maintenance and was denied the benefit of assets concealed by Husband. Husband also appeals from the denial of his motion to enforce the agreement. Affirmed. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this Order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Husband appeals from an order finding Husband had induced Wife to agree to a settlement of their dissolution proceeding whereby Wife waived maintenance and was denied the benefit of assets concealed by Husband. Husband also appeals from the denial of his motion to enforce the agreement. Affirmed. The findings and conclusions of the trial court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would serve no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this Order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cooper v. Cooper, 835 S.W.2d 327, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 667, 1992 WL 80982 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

835 S.W.2d 327 (Cooper v. Cooper) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.