Cooper v. Chase & Co.

2 F.R.D. 381, 1942 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1731
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. Florida
DecidedApril 1, 1942
DocketNo. 30
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2 F.R.D. 381 (Cooper v. Chase & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooper v. Chase & Co., 2 F.R.D. 381, 1942 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1731 (S.D. Fla. 1942).

Opinion

AKERMAN, District Judge.

This cause coming on to be heard on the defendant’s motion to dismiss, counsel for the defendant appeared in person, and counsel for the plaintiff submitted a brief.

The Court is of the opinion that the motion to dismiss must be granted. The alleged libelous letter should either be set out in haec verba or its legal tenor pleaded in order that the Court may determine whether or not the same is libelous.

Counsel for defendant will prepare and present to the Court an order sustaining the motion to dismiss and allowing the plaintiff until May 4th to file an amended complaint, if he so desires.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Paul W. Burkett v. United States
402 F.2d 1002 (Court of Claims, 1968)
Montgomery v. Kingsland
166 F.2d 953 (D.C. Circuit, 1948)
Edelman v. Locker
6 F.R.D. 272 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 F.R.D. 381, 1942 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1731, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-chase-co-flsd-1942.