Cooper v. Brantley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cooper v. Brantley

112 S.E. 830, 153 Ga. 600, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 129

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided June 15, 1922·No. No. 2754·Published

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

“ Where there is no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom demands a particular verdict, the court may direct the jury to find for the party entitled thereto.” Civil Code (1910), § 5926. Applying this rule to the evidence introduced on the trial of this ease, the court was not authorized to direct the verdict of which complaint is made.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Larsen & Oroclcett, for plaintiff in error. Adams & Gamp, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fish, C. J.

“ Where there is no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom demands a particular verdict, the court may direct the jury to find for the party entitled thereto.” Civil Code (1910), § 5926. Applying this rule to the evidence introduced on the trial of this ease, the court was not authorized to direct the verdict of which complaint is made.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Larsen & Oroclcett, for plaintiff in error. Adams & Gamp, contra.

Cooper v. Brantley, 112 S.E. 830, 153 Ga. 600, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 129 (Ga. 1922).

Pincite

112 S.E. 830 (Cooper v. Brantley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.