Cooper v. Brantley

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cooper v. Brantley

112 S.E. 830, 153 Ga. 600, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 129

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedJune 15, 1922

DocketNo. 2754

StatusPublished

This text of 112 S.E. 830 (Cooper v. Brantley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. Brantley, 112 S.E. 830, 153 Ga. 600, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 129 (Ga. 1922).

Pincite

Opinion

Fish, C. J.

“ Where there is no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom demands a particular verdict, the court may direct the jury to find for the party entitled thereto.” Civil Code (1910), § 5926. Applying this rule to the evidence introduced on the trial of this ease, the court was not authorized to direct the verdict of which complaint is made.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Larsen & Oroclcett, for plaintiff in error. Adams & Gamp, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fish, C. J.

“ Where there is no conflict in the evidence, and that introduced with all reasonable deductions or inferences therefrom demands a particular verdict, the court may direct the jury to find for the party entitled thereto.” Civil Code (1910), § 5926. Applying this rule to the evidence introduced on the trial of this ease, the court was not authorized to direct the verdict of which complaint is made.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur. Larsen & Oroclcett, for plaintiff in error. Adams & Gamp, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 S.E. 830, 153 Ga. 600, 1922 Ga. LEXIS 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-brantley-ga-1922.