Cooper v. Branch

Supreme Court of Georgia

Cooper v. Branch

24 S.E. 407, 99 Ga. 69

DecidedMarch 23, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 24 S.E. 407 (Cooper v. Branch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. Branch, 24 S.E. 407, 99 Ga. 69 (Ga. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

This case Raving been tried substantially in accordance with the principles announced when it was before this court at the March term, 1889 (82 Ga. 512), there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial, there being sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, which was reasonable in amount, and no error of law having been committed by the trial judge in excluding evidence, in charging the jury, or in refusing to charge as requested. Judgment affirmed.

Denmark & Adams, for plaintiff in error. Mercer & Mercer, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Simmons, C. J.

This case Raving been tried substantially in accordance with the principles announced when it was before this court at the March term, 1889 (82 Ga. 512), there was no abuse of discretion in refusing to grant a new trial, there being sufficient evidence to sustain the verdict, which was reasonable in amount, and no error of law having been committed by the trial judge in excluding evidence, in charging the jury, or in refusing to charge as requested. Judgment affirmed.

Denmark & Adams, for plaintiff in error. Mercer & Mercer, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 S.E. 407, 99 Ga. 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-branch-ga-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack