Cooper v. Bogue

Oregon Supreme Court

Cooper v. Bogue

179 P. 658, 92 Or. 122, 1919 Ore. LEXIS 96

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedApril 8, 1919

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 179 P. 658 (Cooper v. Bogue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooper v. Bogue, 179 P. 658, 92 Or. 122, 1919 Ore. LEXIS 96 (Or. 1919).

Pincite

Opinions

BENSON, J.

1. This case presents but one question for our consideration. Can a party prosecute [124]*124an appeal from a judgment while a writ of review to the same court is still pending? This question has been definitely answered in the negative by this court, in the case of Clubine v. City of Merrill, 83 Or. 87 (163 Pac. 85). The two remedies are concurrent but they cannot be exercised at the same time.

The judgment, of the lower court is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

McBride, C. J., and Burnett and Harris, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BENSON, J.

1. This case presents but one question for our consideration. Can a party prosecute [124]*124an appeal from a judgment while a writ of review to the same court is still pending? This question has been definitely answered in the negative by this court, in the case of Clubine v. City of Merrill, 83 Or. 87 (163 Pac. 85). The two remedies are concurrent but they cannot be exercised at the same time.

The judgment, of the lower court is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

McBride, C. J., and Burnett and Harris, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 P. 658, 92 Or. 122, 1919 Ore. LEXIS 96, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-bogue-or-1919.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack