Cooper v. Bogue

179 P. 658, 92 Or. 122, 1919 Ore. LEXIS 96
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided April 8, 1919·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

BENSON, J.

1. This case presents but one question for our consideration. Can a party prosecute [124]*124an appeal from a judgment while a writ of review to the same court is still pending? This question has been definitely answered in the negative by this court, in the case of Clubine v. City of Merrill, 83 Or. 87 (163 Pac. 85). The two remedies are concurrent but they cannot be exercised at the same time.

The judgment, of the lower court is therefore affirmed. Affirmed.

McBride, C. J., and Burnett and Harris, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Bogue, 179 P. 658, 92 Or. 122, 1919 Ore. LEXIS 96 (Or. 1919).

179 P. 658 (Cooper v. Bogue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bechtold v. Wilson
187 P.2d 675 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1947)
Kamm v. City of Portland
285 P. 240 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)
Beebe v. City of St. Helens
264 P. 845 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1928)