Cooper v. Blakey

10 Ga. 263
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 15, 1851
DocketNo. 37
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 10 Ga. 263 (Cooper v. Blakey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooper v. Blakey, 10 Ga. 263 (Ga. 1851).

Opinion

By the Court.

Warner, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] The objections urged against the will of the testator in this case, are precisely the same as were urged before this Court, in the case of Vance vs. Crawford, in opposition to the will of Marshall Keith. It was held by this Court in that case, that it is not against the policy of the State of Georgia, for the owner of slaves to remove them out of the State for manumission, and that he may direct it to be done by will. In the case of Jordan vs. The Heirs of Bradley, (Dudley’s Rep. 170,) the same decision was made by the Judges in convention. We have examined the question as decided in both of the cases above referred to, and with increased confidence, re-affirm the judgment of the Court in Vance against Crawford. In that case, as in this, there was a bequest to the slaves by the testator of a portion of his property, which was held to have been a valid Request. 4 Geo. Rep. 446.

Let the judgment of the Court below be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Green v. Anderson
38 Ga. 655 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1869)
Walker v. Walker
25 Ga. 420 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1858)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 Ga. 263, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-blakey-ga-1851.