Cooper v. Baker
139 A. 254, 33 Del. 489, 3 W.W. Harr. 489, 1927 Del. LEXIS 34
This text of 139 A. 254 (Cooper v. Baker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cooper v. Baker, 139 A. 254, 33 Del. 489, 3 W.W. Harr. 489, 1927 Del. LEXIS 34 (Del. Ct. App. 1927).
Opinion
As the alleged statement of the deceased was not an admission against interest, did not accompany any act done by him, and was not a statement of intention, it does not come within any exception to the hearsay rule; we, therefore, grant the motion to strike out. State v. Long, 2 W. W. Harr. (32 Del.) 380, 123 A. 350; Wigmore on Evidence, vol. 3, § 1712; Greenleaf on Ev., § 108, vol. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Long
123 A. 350 (Delaware Court of Oyer and Terminer, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
139 A. 254, 33 Del. 489, 3 W.W. Harr. 489, 1927 Del. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-v-baker-delsuperct-1927.