Cooper v. Apartment Investment & Management Co.

334 F. App'x 46
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided August 18, 2009·No. No. 08-3782·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tawana Cooper appeals the district court’s1 order dismissing her civil action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction un[47] der the Rooker-Feldman2 doctrine. Following de novo review, see Riehm v. Engelking, 538 F.3d 952, 964 (8th Cir.2008), we conclude the dismissal was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper v. Apartment Investment & Management Co., 334 F. App'x 46 (8th Cir. 2009).

334 F. App'x 46 (Cooper v. Apartment Investment & Management Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
263 U.S. 413 (Supreme Court, 1924)
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
460 U.S. 462 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Riehm v. Engelking
538 F.3d 952 (Eighth Circuit, 2008)