Cooper & Co. v. Jacobs & Belsinger
82 Ala. 411
Opinion
— The execution issued by the justice of the peace, Hilton, was properly excluded from admission in evidence, being void on its face. It fails to show in whose favor it was issued, and amounted to nothing more than a roving commission to any constable of the county to make a certain sum of money out of the goods and chattels of Hayes and Roberts. The indorsement on the back of the execution was no part of it, and can not be looked to in aid of this fatal defect.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cooper & Co. v. Jacobs & Belsinger, 82 Ala. 411 (Ala. 1886).
82 Ala. 411 (Cooper & Co. v. Jacobs & Belsinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barrett v. Brownlee
67 So. 467 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1914)
Jordan Bros. v. Gordon
62 So. 1023 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
Collins v. Hines
99 S.W. 400 (Texas Supreme Court, 1907)
Smith v. Bell
33 S.E. 684 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)