Cooper Bus Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.

158 N.E. 543, 117 Ohio St. 287, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 702, 117 Ohio St. (N.S.) 287, 1927 Ohio LEXIS 242
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 19, 1927
DocketNo. 20543
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 158 N.E. 543 (Cooper Bus Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooper Bus Co. v. Pub. Util. Comm., 158 N.E. 543, 117 Ohio St. 287, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 702, 117 Ohio St. (N.S.) 287, 1927 Ohio LEXIS 242 (Ohio 1927).

Opinion

BY THE COURT.

H. W. Collins was the owner of a certificate of convenience and necessity under which he operated a bus line between Chillicothe and McArthur, Ohio. An application was made by him to the Public Utilities Commission for authority to extend said bus line from Mc-Arthur to Athens, by way of Albany.

The Cooper Bus Company has for some time been operating a bus line from Athens to Albany, and made application for authority to extend its bus line from Albany to McArthur. These applications were heard together.

The Commission granted the application of Collins with a restriction against carrying passengers whose whole ride is between Athens and Albany, the route covered by the Cooper Bus Company’s certificate, and denied the application of the Cooper Bus Company for an extension of its line from Albany to McArthur.

The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company protested both applications, but withdrew its protest against the Cooper Bus Company, and later abandoned its protest against Collins, no application for a rehearing having been filed or steps taken to perfect error proceedings by that company. This proceeding in error is prosecuted by the -Cooper Bus Company.

*703 In so far as the applicants, Collins and the Cooper Bus Company, sought to extend their respective routes so as to render service between McArthur and Albany, the granting of the one application and the refusal of the other was wholly a matter of discretion of the Public Utilities Commission, it appearing that each of the applicants is prepared to meet all requirements essential to the rendition of the proposed service. ' We are of the opinion, however, that the rule announced in the case of Columbus, Delaware & Marion Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 116 Ohio St., 92, should he applied, and that in cases such as presented the commission should not grant overlapping certificates.

The order of the commission is therefore modiled by so limiting the extension granted to Collins as to authorize him to operate said bus line only as far as Albany.

(Marshall, CJ., Day, Allen, Kinkade, Robinson and Matthias, JJ., concur. Jones, J., not participating.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Huntington Natl. Bank v. Schneider
2023 Ohio 4813 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2023)
Harshman Dynasty, L.L.C. v. Mason
2014 Ohio 1108 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Cadlerock Joint Venture, L.P. v. Freeway Circle Properties, L.L.C.
2011 Ohio 3986 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)
Audiovax Corp. v. Schindler, Unpublished Decision (5-6-2005)
2005 Ohio 2231 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
Hopkins v. INA Underwriters Insurance
542 N.E.2d 679 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1988)
St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Industrial Commission
506 N.E.2d 202 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1987)
State Bank of Downs v. Moss
454 P.2d 554 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1969)
Lakemore Plaza, Inc. v. Shoenterprise Corp.
188 N.E.2d 203 (Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas, 1962)
F. D. Cline Paving Co. v. Southland Speedways, Inc.
108 S.E.2d 641 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1959)
Koblegard Co. v. Maxwell
34 S.E.2d 116 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1945)
Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Woodbridge
42 A.2d 231 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1945)
Blair, Supt. of Bks v. Bd. of Education
176 N.E. 99 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 N.E. 543, 117 Ohio St. 287, 5 Ohio Law. Abs. 702, 117 Ohio St. (N.S.) 287, 1927 Ohio LEXIS 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooper-bus-co-v-pub-util-comm-ohio-1927.