Cooper Agency, Inc. v. Harold M. McLeod District Director of Internal Revenue and United States of America

348 F.2d 919, 16 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5445, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4721
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 4, 1965·No. 9871·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs seek to test their tax liabilities in an action for an injunction and for removal of the cloud cast upon their properties by the tax liens. The judgment of the District Court dismissing these complaints is affirmed for the reasons stated by the District Judge 1

We recently considered similar contentions and held them unavailing. 2 At about the same time the Second and Third Circuits arrived at the same conclusion. 3

Affirmed.

1

. 235 F.Supp. 276.

2

. Broadwell v. United States, 4 Cir., 343 F.2d 470.

3

. Falik v. United States, 2 Cir., 343 F.2d 38; Quinn v. Hook, 3 Cir., 341 F.2d 920.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooper Agency, Inc. v. Harold M. McLeod District Director of Internal Revenue and United States of America, 348 F.2d 919, 16 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 5445, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 4721 (4th Cir. 1965).

348 F.2d 919 (Cooper Agency, Inc. v. Harold M. McLeod District Director of Internal Revenue and United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carol Smith Shannon v. United States
521 F.2d 56 (Ninth Circuit, 1975)
United States v. Estate of Claude Beresford Pearce
498 F.2d 847 (Third Circuit, 1974)
States Marine Lines, Inc. v. Shultz
359 F. Supp. 512 (D. South Carolina, 1973)
Shaw v. United States
321 F. Supp. 1267 (D. Vermont, 1970)
Nehf v. United States
278 F. Supp. 444 (N.D. Illinois, 1967)
Fred Floyd v. United States
361 F.2d 312 (Fourth Circuit, 1966)