Coonts v. Randolph County Commission
This text of 671 F. App'x 78 (Coonts v. Randolph County Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William Wayne Coonts appeals the district court’s order granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss Coonts’ civil action. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Coonts’ informal brief does not challenge the district court’s dispositive analysis, Coonts has waived appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
671 F. App'x 78, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coonts-v-randolph-county-commission-ca4-2016.