Cooney v. Long Island Lighting Co.

5 A.D.2d 849, 172 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6880

Opinion

Action for wrongful death and for conscious pain and suffering against Gull Contracting Co., Inc., the alleged owner of a crane, and Andrew Gull Corporation, which leased the crane from the owner. The crane which had been leased by Andrew Gull Corporation to intestate’s employer, toppled over the side of a pier, while being operated by the intestate, and fell 20 feet to the deck of a barge tied up at the pier. The appeal is from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of the administratrix. Judgment reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The findings of fact have not been considered. In our opinion, the testimony of respondent’s expert failed to furnish a sufficient basis of fact upon which the jury could find that the crane was improperly mounted to the chassis in any particular defective manner, aseribable to the negligence of the appellants as a proximate cause of the intestate’s death (cf. Dougherty v. Milliken, 163 N. Y. 527, 534; People v. Samuels, 302 N. Y. 163, 172; Weibert v. Hanan, 202 N. Y. 328). The jury’s verdict may not he founded upon expert testimony based only on speculation and without a concrete basis of fact from which an inference of negligence may be drawn (Sparkill Realty Corp. v. State of New York, 268 N. Y. 192).

Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Hallinan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooney v. Long Island Lighting Co., 5 A.D.2d 849, 172 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

5 A.D.2d 849 (Cooney v. Long Island Lighting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dougherty v. . Milliken
57 N.E. 757 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Weibert v. . Hanan
95 N.E. 688 (New York Court of Appeals, 1911)
Sparkill Realty Corp. v. State of New York
197 N.E. 192 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
People v. Samuels
96 N.E.2d 757 (New York Court of Appeals, 1951)