Cooney & Bainer, P.C. v. Milum

Connecticut Appellate Court

Cooney & Bainer, P.C. v. Milum

713 A.2d 921, 48 Conn. App. 916, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 221

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedApril 28, 1998

DocketAC 17253

StatusPublished

This text of 713 A.2d 921 (Cooney & Bainer, P.C. v. Milum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooney & Bainer, P.C. v. Milum, 713 A.2d 921, 48 Conn. App. 916, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 221 (Colo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff on the defendant’s counterclaim. Having heard oral arguments and reviewed the record, transcripts and briefs, we conclude that the trial court acted in accordance with applicable law and that the granting of summary judgment was proper. We find the defendant’s claims to be without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The defendant appeals from the summary judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff on the defendant’s counterclaim. Having heard oral arguments and reviewed the record, transcripts and briefs, we conclude that the trial court acted in accordance with applicable law and that the granting of summary judgment was proper. We find the defendant’s claims to be without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

713 A.2d 921, 48 Conn. App. 916, 1998 Conn. App. LEXIS 221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooney-bainer-pc-v-milum-connappct-1998.