Coon v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Coon v. State

386 S.W.3d 238, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1505, 2012 WL 5907477

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 27, 2012·No. No. WD 74738·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan James Coon appeals the motion court’s dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed. Coon contends the motion court erred in dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed because he pleaded factual allegations that demonstrate that he made a good faith effort to file a timely motion by “apparently giving it to prison authorities for mailing well on or before the due date.”

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Jonathan James Coon appeals the motion court’s dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed. Coon contends the motion court erred in dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion as untimely filed because he pleaded factual allegations that demonstrate that he made a good faith effort to file a timely motion by “apparently giving it to prison authorities for mailing well on or before the due date.”

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Coon v. State, 386 S.W.3d 238, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1505, 2012 WL 5907477 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

386 S.W.3d 238 (Coon v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.