Coon v. Maddox

1953 OK 53, 253 P.2d 1075, 208 Okla. 141, 1953 Okla. LEXIS 730
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided February 24, 1953·No. No. 34546·Published

Opinion

BLACKBIRD, Justice.

The plaintiff in error has appealed from a judgment entered against him in the-trial court and on the 15th day of April, 1950, [1076] he filed his brief. The authorities in the brief reasonably- sustain the allegations of error. The defendant in error has filed no brief and has offered.no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Gooldy v. Hines, 186 Okl. 583, 99 P.2d 498, it is not the 'duty of this court to search the. record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court but the cause may be reversed. and remanded with directions,

The cause is reversed and remanded with directions to vacate the judgment entered for the defendant in error and grant a new trial.

HALLEY, C. J., JOHNSON, V. C. J., and WELCH, CORN, ARNOLD, O’NEAL and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coon v. Maddox, 1953 OK 53, 253 P.2d 1075, 208 Okla. 141, 1953 Okla. LEXIS 730 (Okla. 1953).

1953 OK 53 (Coon v. Maddox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gooldy v. Hines
1940 OK 93 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1940)