Coon Rapids National Bank, in Error v. Maggie I. Lee, 1 Etc
239 U.S. 659, 60 L. Ed. 489, 36 S. Ct. 284, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1364
Opinion
239 U.S. 659
36 S.Ct. 284
60 L.Ed. 489
COON RAPIDS NATIONAL BANK et al., Plaintiffs in Error,
v.
MAGGIE I. LEE,1 Executrix, etc.
No. 796.
Supreme Court of the United States
January 10, 1916
No appearance for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. A. B. Cummins and Mr. O. M. Brockett for defendant in error.
Docketed and dismissed with costs, pursuant to the Ninth Rule.
1
Death of Anderville Lee suggested, and appearance of Maggie I. Lee, as party in error herein, filed and entered on January 10, 1916.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coon Rapids National Bank, in Error v. Maggie I. Lee, 1 Etc, 239 U.S. 659, 60 L. Ed. 489, 36 S. Ct. 284, 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1364 (1916).
239 U.S. 659 (Coon Rapids National Bank, in Error v. Maggie I. Lee, 1 Etc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commercial Insurance Co. of Newark v. Pacific-Peru Construction Corp.
558 F.2d 948 (Ninth Circuit, 1977)
Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey v. Pacific-Peru Construction Corp. And the Hawaii Corporation, the Hawaii Corporation, Third-Party v. American International Underwriters Corporation, Third-Party
558 F.2d 948 (Third Circuit, 1977)
John P. King v. The United States
390 F.2d 894 (Court of Claims, 1968)