Coomer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Coomer v. State

578 S.W.3d 840

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 11, 2019·No. No. ED 106918·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

*841Dallis F. Coomer appeals from the "Judgment and Order" denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his "Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing" for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

*841Dallis F. Coomer appeals from the "Judgment and Order" denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his "Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment and Sentence and Request for Evidentiary Hearing" for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 24.035. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law applicable to this case would serve no jurisprudential or precedential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the Judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Coomer v. State, 578 S.W.3d 840 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

578 S.W.3d 840 (Coomer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.