Coolidge v. Stoddard

120 A.D. 641, 105 N.Y.S. 544, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1276
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 25, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 120 A.D. 641 (Coolidge v. Stoddard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coolidge v. Stoddard, 120 A.D. 641, 105 N.Y.S. 544, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1276 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

Kellogg, J.:

This action is' brought to recover upon four promissory notes,, each set up in a separate count. The answer denies each count separately, and, among other things, alleges as to each note that prior to the commencement of the action the defendant paid, satisfied and discharged the same. The plaintiff, upon affidavit that he has no knowledge of any payment except those expressly admitted in the complaint, and that he has no information or means of - information as to any other payments, and upon letters from the defendant practically admitting liability for a great part of the indebted-mess claimed, asks á bill of particulars of the payments claimed. The case presents facts which .render a bill, of particulars clearly proper if particulars may be ordered as to alleged payments. That ■ such order may be made is established in this department by Klock v. Brennan (35 N. Y. St. Repr. 745) and seems to be well within-the provisions of section 531 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The order is, therefore, reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and a bill of particulars ordered stating with reasonable certainty the time, place and amount of the payments, or when and how the notes were otherwise satisfied or discharged.

All concurred.

Order reversed, with ten- dollars costs and disbursements, and bill of particulars ordered stating with reasonable certainty the time and place and amount óf payñients, or when and how thp notes were otherwise satisfied or discharged. .

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Joffe v. Harbor Tank Storage Co.
17 A.D.2d 848 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Nonpareil Painting Co. v. Holling
135 Misc. 552 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1930)
Sittig v. Cohen
130 A.D. 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)
In re the Examination of Stoddard
128 A.D. 759 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
120 A.D. 641, 105 N.Y.S. 544, 1907 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coolidge-v-stoddard-nyappdiv-1907.