Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School Dist.

802 N.E.2d 155, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1425
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 21, 2004
Docket2002- 1407
StatusPublished

This text of 802 N.E.2d 155 (Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School Dist.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School Dist., 802 N.E.2d 155, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1425 (Ohio 2004).

Opinion

Hancock App. No. 5-01-42, 2002-Ohio-3401. Reported at 100 Ohio St.3d 141, 2003-Ohio-5357, 797 N.E.2d 61. On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Hildebrandt and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent. Lee H. Hildebrandt Jr., J., of the First Appellate District, sitting for Cook, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Coolidge v. Riverdale Local School District
100 Ohio St. 3d 141 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 N.E.2d 155, 101 Ohio St. 3d 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coolidge-v-riverdale-local-school-dist-ohio-2004.