Coolidge v. Poor
15 Mass. 427
Opinion
The single question, in this case, is whether, when a commission merchant, residing and transacting his business in this state, shall have occasion to sue his correspondent, living in another stale, for the balance of his account, the cause of action shall be said to have arisen here, or in such other state ; and we are all of opinion the cause of action arises here, and that judgment, in this ease, be entered upon the verdict,
Vide Tappan vs. Poor & Al., ante, 419
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coolidge v. Poor, 15 Mass. 427 (Mass. 1819).
15 Mass. 427 (Coolidge v. Poor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Abell v. Penn Mutual Life Insurance
18 W. Va. 400 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1881)
So. Boston Iron Co. v. Boston Locomotive Works
51 Me. 585 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1862)
Very v. McHenry
29 Me. 206 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1848)
Towne v. Smith
24 F. Cas. 93 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts, 1846)
Boyle v. Zacharie & Turner
31 U.S. 635 (Supreme Court, 1832)
Andrews v. Herriot
4 Cow. 508 (New York Supreme Court, 1825)