Coolidge v. Commissioner

2 T.C.M. 1166, 1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 17
United States Tax Court·Decided December 27, 1943·No. Docket Nos. 109251, 109252.·Unpublished

Opinion

E. B. Coolidge and Destie Coolidge v. Commissioner. E. B. Coolidge v. Commissioner.
Coolidge v. Commissioner
Docket Nos. 109251, 109252.
United States Tax Court
1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 17; 2 T.C.M. (CCH) 1166; T.C.M. (RIA) 43531;
December 27, 1943

*17 In 1930 petitioner, E. B. Coolidge, was the owner of certain shares of stock of The Montana Corporation of which he was the president and directing head. On December 20, 1930, he executed a trust indenture in which he transferred these shares to himself as trustee, naming his wife and three children as the beneficiaries of the trust. The purpose of the trust was stated therein to be: "to hold and keep said stock as a unit for all purposes, particularly for the purpose of maintaining control and direction of said company in which said stock is held for the benefit of the beneficiaries named herein". The duration of the trust was not fixed and no provision was made as to whether the income from the property should be accumulated or whether it should be distributed. Since the execution of the trust indenture the settlor has several times by supplemental declarations transferred other stocks to himself as trustee to be held for the beneficiaries in the same manner as specified in the trust indenture of December 20, 1930. In the taxable years 1937, 1938 and 1939 the settlor voted the stock as trustee. Sums equal to a substantial part of the net income in each of the years were distributed*18 to the settlor's wife and entered on the cash book of the trust as "advances". Smaller sums were paid to the other beneficiaries. Other sums were used to pay insurance premiums, presumably on the life of the settlor. Held, following Helvering v. Clifford, 309 U.S. 331 that on account of the dominion and control which the settlor of the trust continued to exercise over the corpus and income, the income from the property is taxable to the settlor.

William B. Finlay, C.P.A., and La Rue Smith, Esq., for the petitioners. T. M. Mather, Esq., for the respondent.

BLACK

s have been consolidated. Docket No. 109251 involves deficiencies in income tax which the Commissioner has determined against E. B. Coolidge and Destie Coolidge for the years 1938 and 1939 in the respective amounts of $336.70 and $316.45. Docket No. 109252 involves a deficiency in income tax which the Commissioner has determined against E. B. Coolidge for the year 1937 of $516.93. In each instance, the deficiency results from the addition to the taxpayer's net income, as reported on his return, of dividends from domestic corporations. In each deficiency notice the Commissioner has explained*19 the grounds of his determination. That contained the deficiency notice for the year 1937 is typical of the explanation given for the years 1938 and 1939 and reads as follows:

(a) For each of the years 1937, 1938 and 1939, substantial amounts of income in the form of dividends were received on stocks apparently held in the name of E. B. Coolidge, Trustee. Such income was reported on a separate income tax return, Form 1040, filed for each of these three years in the name of the E. B. Coolidge, Trustee, as income of a trust. The dividends were received from the following named corporations:

193719381939
Montana Corpora-
tion$4,612.10$3,408.12
Montana Gas Cor-
poration564.00$ 456.00
Hardrock Oil Com-
pany186.75
Consumers Gas
Company2,159.63
Miscellaneous185.95.75
Total$5,548.80$3,408.12$2,616.38

So far as can be ascertained the trust had no specific name, but is referred to as E. B. Coolidge, Trustee, in the separate returns filed for the three years mentioned above. For all years prior to and including the year 1936, the income of this alleged trust was combined with your own personal income and included in one return filed by you for*20 each year.

On or about December 20, 1930, you made a Declaration of Trust under the provisions of which you were the donor or grantor of the trust and also the sole trustee. There is no provision in the trust declaration as to how long the trust should continue. Nothing is said therein as to earnings and dividends, and no power is given to the trustee to receive, hold, accumulate, or distribute the dividends. The rights to dividends are not indicated in the trust declaration, whether they belong to the settlor of the trust or to the beneficiaries. No provision is made for the further acquisition of property by the trustee in any way.

It is held that the trust cannot be recognized for income tax purposes because of the uncertainty and vagueness of the declaration of trust.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Coolidge v. Commissioner, 2 T.C.M. 1166, 1943 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 17 (tax 1943).

2 T.C.M. 1166 (Coolidge v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Helvering v. Clifford
309 U.S. 331 (Supreme Court, 1940)