Coolidge v. Cary
14 Mass. 115
This text of 14 Mass. 115 (Coolidge v. Cary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coolidge v. Cary, 14 Mass. 115 (Mass. 1817).
Opinion
After the default of the defendant, judgment goes, of course, unless there be good reason for postponing it, as where there is a prior attachment of property. There is no sufficient reason for delay in the present case.
Let judgment he entered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Blatchford v. Goularte
11 Mass. App. Div. 281 (Mass. Dist. Ct., App. Div., 1946)
Wright v. Burbee
22 A.2d 494 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1941)
Dalton-Ingersoll Co. v. Fiske
55 N.E. 468 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Bailey v. Edmundson
46 N.E. 1064 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1897)
New-Hampshire Strafford Bank v. Cornell
2 N.H. 324 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1821)
Champion v. Noyes
2 Mass. 481 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1807)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
14 Mass. 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coolidge-v-cary-mass-1817.