Cooley v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Cooley v. State

844 S.W.2d 40, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1599, 1992 WL 292482

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 20, 1992·No. No. 61378·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s Rule 24.035 Motion. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. After reviewing the record, we find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Movant’s Rule 24.035 Motion. Therefore, we affirm the trial court’s decision pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, solely for their information, setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Cooley v. State, 844 S.W.2d 40, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 1599, 1992 WL 292482 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

844 S.W.2d 40 (Cooley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.