Cooley v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Cooley v. State

623 S.W.2d 516, 274 Ark. 265, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1454

DecidedNovember 9, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 623 S.W.2d 516 (Cooley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cooley v. State, 623 S.W.2d 516, 274 Ark. 265, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1454 (Ark. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Bradford Lee Cooley, by his attorney has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Don A. Eilbott, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Appellant, Bradford Lee Cooley, by his attorney has filed for a rule on the clerk.

His attorney, Don A. Eilbott, admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See our Per Curiam opinion dated February 5,1979, In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases.

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

623 S.W.2d 516, 274 Ark. 265, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1454, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooley-v-state-ark-1981.