Cooley v. Powers
This text of 723 P.2d 348 (Cooley v. Powers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants appeal from judgments ordering specific performance of a land sale contract, entering judgment for the unpaid balance, ordering a sheriffs sale without right of redemption if the judgment is not paid and specifying that plaintiffs could execute on any deficiency.
Our review of the record convinces us that the remedy of specific performance is not so harsh or oppressive in this case that it should be denied. Renard v. Allen, 237 Or 406, 418, 391 P2d 777 (1964). No statutory right of redemption exists following foreclosure of an equitable vendor’s lien even though the vendor may obtain a deficiency judgment. Emco Investment, Inc. v. Vaden, 60 Or App 762, 655 P2d 220 (1982).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
723 P.2d 348, 80 Or. App. 591, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooley-v-powers-orctapp-1986.