Cooley v. Craft

89 S.E. 204, 145 Ga. 298, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 283
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 13, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. Under the rulings in Holmes v. Holmes, 106 Ga. 858 (33 S. E. 216), and Horne v. Mullis, 119 Ga. 534 (46 S. E. 663), there was no error in overruling the demurrer to the petition in this ease.

2. While the charge of the court in regard to express and implied trusts was not altogether clear or accurate, under the pleadings and evidence in this case it does not furnish cause for a new trial.

3. The verdict is supported by the great weight of the testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cooley v. Craft, 89 S.E. 204, 145 Ga. 298, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 283 (Ga. 1916).

89 S.E. 204 (Cooley v. Craft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. Turner
105 S.E. 471 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)