Cooley v. Craft

89 S.E. 204, 145 Ga. 298, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 283
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 S.E. 204 (Cooley v. Craft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooley v. Craft, 89 S.E. 204, 145 Ga. 298, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 283 (Ga. 1916).

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. Under the rulings in Holmes v. Holmes, 106 Ga. 858 (33 S. E. 216), and Horne v. Mullis, 119 Ga. 534 (46 S. E. 663), there was no error in overruling the demurrer to the petition in this ease.

2. While the charge of the court in regard to express and implied trusts was not altogether clear or accurate, under the pleadings and evidence in this case it does not furnish cause for a new trial.

3. The verdict is supported by the great weight of the testimony.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bailey v. Turner
105 S.E. 471 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
89 S.E. 204, 145 Ga. 298, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 283, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooley-v-craft-ga-1916.