Cooledge & Sons Inc. v. Johnson-Gewinner Co.

88 S.E. 409, 17 Ga. App. 733, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 887
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 24, 1916
Docket6671
StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.E. 409 (Cooledge & Sons Inc. v. Johnson-Gewinner Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cooledge & Sons Inc. v. Johnson-Gewinner Co., 88 S.E. 409, 17 Ga. App. 733, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 887 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

Wade, J.

1. Assignments of error not referred to in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff in error must be treated as abandoned.

2. Whether the acts of negligence alleged were the proximate cause of the damages resulting from a collision by the plaintiff’s motorcycle with the defendant’s automobile was a question for the jury. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict, and the appellate division of the municipal court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 S.E. 409, 17 Ga. App. 733, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cooledge-sons-inc-v-johnson-gewinner-co-gactapp-1916.