Coolbroth v. Purinton
29 Me. 469
This text of 29 Me. 469 (Coolbroth v. Purinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Coolbroth v. Purinton, 29 Me. 469 (Me. 1849).
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was given orally by
The Court are satisfied, that the paper declared on, is the promissory note of the defendant, payable in money and for a sum certain, and being witnessed the statute of limitations does not apply. JDefendant defaulted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Citizens Bank of Georgetown v. Jones
220 P. 787 (Washington Supreme Court, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
29 Me. 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/coolbroth-v-purinton-me-1849.