Coolbroth v. Purinton
29 Me. 469
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was given orally by
The Court are satisfied, that the paper declared on, is the promissory note of the defendant, payable in money and for a sum certain, and being witnessed the statute of limitations does not apply. JDefendant defaulted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Coolbroth v. Purinton, 29 Me. 469 (Me. 1849).
29 Me. 469 (Coolbroth v. Purinton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Citizens Bank of Georgetown v. Jones
220 P. 787 (Washington Supreme Court, 1923)